Contact Us | Language: čeština English
Title: | Caseinate-stabilized emulsions of black cumin and tamanu oils: preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity | ||||||||||
Author: | Urbánková, Lucie; Kašpárková, Věra; Egner, Pavlína; Rudolf, Ondřej; Korábková, Eva | ||||||||||
Document type: | Peer-reviewed article (English) | ||||||||||
Source document: | Polymers. 2019, vol. 11, issue 12 | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 2073-4360 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR) | ||||||||||
Journal Impact
This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time
|
|||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11121951 | ||||||||||
Abstract: | Caseinate-stabilized emulsions of black cumin (Nigella sativa) and tamanu (Calophyllum inophyllum) oils were studied in terms of preparation, characterization, and antibacterial properties. The oils were described while using their basic characteristics, including fatty acid composition and scavenging activity. The oil-in-water (o/w) emulsions containing the studied oils were formulated, and the influence of protein stabilizer (sodium caseinate (CAS), 1-12 wt %), oil contents (5-30 wt %), and emulsification methods (high-shear homogenization vs. sonication) on the emulsion properties were investigated. It was observed that, under both preparation methods, emulsions of small, initial droplet sizes were predominantly formed with CAS content that was higher than 7.5 wt %. Sonication was a more efficient emulsification procedure and was afforded emulsions with smaller droplet size throughout the entire used concentration ranges of oils and CAS when compared to high-shear homogenization. At native pH of similar to 6.5, all of the emulsions exhibited negative zeta potential that originated from the presence of caseinate. The antibacterial activities of both oils and their emulsions were investigated with respect to the growth suppression of common spoilage bacteria while using the disk diffusion method. The oils and selected emulsions were proven to act against gram positive strains, mainly against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Bacillus cereus (B. cereus); regrettably, the gram negative species were fully resistant against their action. | ||||||||||
Full text: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/12/1951 | ||||||||||
Show full item record |