Territorial cohesion and the geography of EU Cohesion policy funding in the Czech Republic

Novosák, Jiří; Hájek, Oldřich; Smékalová, Lenka; Nekolová, Jana; Škarka, Milan

dc.title	Territorial cohesion and the geography of EU Cohesion policy funding in the Czech Republic	en
dc.contributor.author	Novosák, Jiří
dc.contributor.author	Hájek, Oldřich
dc.contributor.author	Smékalová, Lenka
dc.contributor.author	Nekolová, Jana
dc.contributor.author	Škarka, Milan
dc.relation.ispartof	Transformations in Business and Economics
dc.identifier.issn	1648-4460 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued	2015
utb.relation.volume	14
utb.relation.issue	3C
dc.citation.spage	419
dc.citation.epage	432
dc.type	article
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Vilnius University
dc.relation.uri	http://www.transformations.knf.vu.lt/36c/article/terr
dc.subject	Absorption capacity	en
dc.subject	Cohesion policy	en
dc.subject	Regional policy	en
dc.subject	Structural disadvantage of regions	en
dc.subject	The Czech Republic	en
dc.description.abstract	This paper concerns the assessment of the match between the selected cornerstones of territorial cohesion, on one hand, and the EU Cohesion policy, which is understood as the source of territorial impacts, on the other hand. In particular, the paper examines the association between EU Cohesion policy funding (2007-2013) in the Czech Republic and the balanced territorial development of Czech micro-regions. Moreover, the spatial coherence of EU Cohesion policy and Czech national regional policy is as well considered. The empirical results do not provide evidence in support of this match. EU Cohesion policy funding does not compensate for the structural disadvantage of Czech micro-regions. Moreover, the spatial coherence of EU Cohesion policy and Czech national regional policy is missing. The territories, the support of which is regarded as desirable for the balanced territorial development by Czech national regional policy, do not show evidence of higher EU Cohesion policy funding. Low absorption capacity in these territories might be an appropriate explanation for this. © Vilnius University, 2002-2015 © Brno University of Technology, 2002-2015 © University of Latvia, 2002-2015.	en
utb.faculty	Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1006295
utb.identifier.rivid	RIV/70883521:28120/15:43873588!RIV16-MSM-28120___
utb.identifier.obdid	43874024
utb.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-84962291222
utb.identifier.wok	000370913800008
utb.source	j-scopus
dc.date.accessioned	2016-06-22T12:14:41Z
dc.date.available	2016-06-22T12:14:41Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Novosák, Jiří
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Hájek, Oldřich
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Smékalová, Lenka
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Nekolová, Jana
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Škarka, Milan
utb.fulltext.affiliation	1 Jiri Novosak Department of Regional Development, Public Sector Administration and Law Faculty of Management and Economics Tomas Bata University in Zlin Mostni 5139 760 01 Zlin The Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] 2 Oldrich Hajek Department of Regional Development, Public Sector Administration and Law Faculty of Management and Economics Tomas Bata University in Zlin Mostni 5139 760 01 Zlin The Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] 3 Lenka Smekalova Department of Regional Development, Public Sector Administration and Law Faculty of Management and Economics Tomas Bata University in Zlin Mostni 5139 760 01 Zlin The Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] 4 Jana Nekolova Department of Regional Development, Public Sector Administration and Law Faculty of Management and Economics Tomas Bata University in Zlin Mostni 5139 760 01 Zlin The Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] 5 Milan Skarka Department of Regional Development, Public Sector Administration and Law Faculty of Management and Economics Tomas Bata University in Zlin Mostni 5139 760 01 Zlin The Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.dates	Received: December, 2014 1st Revision: January, 2015 2nd Revision: April, 2015 Accepted: September, 2015
utb.fulltext.references	Anselin, L., Bera, A.K., Florax, R., Yoon, M.J. (1996), “Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 26, No 1, pp.77-104. Anselin, L., Rey, S. (2014), Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice: A Guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL, Chicago, GeoDa Press. Belás, J., Bilan, Y., Demjan, V., Sipko, J. (2015a), “Entrepreneurship in SME segment: case study from the Czech Republic and Slovakia”, Amfiteatru Economic, Vol. 17, No 38, pp.308-326. Belás, J., Demjan, V., Habánik, J., Hudáková, M., Sipko, J. (2015b), “The business environment of small and medium-sized enterprises in selected regions of the Czech Republic and Slovakia”, E+M Ekonomie a Management, Vol. 18, No 1, pp.95-110. Beugelsdijk, M., Eijffinger, S.C.W. (2005), “The effectiveness of structural policy in the European Union: an empirical analysis for the EU-15 in 1995-2001”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 43, No 1, pp.37-51. Blažek, J., Macešková, M. (2010), “Regional analysis of public capital expenditure: to which regions is public capital expenditure channelled – to ‘rich’ or to ‘poor’ ones?”, Regional Studies, Vol. 44, No 6, pp.679-696. Boldrin, M., Canova, F. (2001), “Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies”, Economic Policy, Vol. 16, No 32, pp.207-253. Boschma, R.A. (2004), “Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective”, Regional Studies, Vol. 38, No 9, pp.1001-1014. Bouvet, F., Dall’erba, S. (2010), “European regional structural funds: how large is the influence of politics on the allocation process?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, No 3, pp.501-528. Camagni, R. (2009), “Territorial impact assessment for European regions: a methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 32, No 4, pp.342-350. Camaioni, B., Esposti, R., Lobianco, A., Pagliacci, F., Sotte, F. (2013), “How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation”, Bio-based and Applied Economics, Vol. 2, No 3, pp.277-300. Capello, R. (2008), “Space and theoretical approaches to regional growth”, in: Capello, R., Camagni, R.P., Chizzolini, B., Fratesi, U. (eds.), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe, Berlin, Springer, pp.13-31. Crescenzi, R. (2009), “Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions”, Regional Studies, Vol. 43, No 1, pp.111-133. Crescenzi, R., De Fillipis, F., Pierangeli, F. (2015), “In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union”, Regional Studies, Vol. 49, No 4, pp.681-704. Dagiliene, G. (2006), “The response to regional disparities in Lithuania”, in: Adams, N., Alden, J., Harris, N. (eds.), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp.221-241. Dall’erba, S., Le Gallo, J. (2008), “Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: a spatial econometric analysis”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 87, No 2, pp.219-245. Dellmuth, L.M. (2011), “The cash divide: the allocation of European Union regional grants”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 18, No 7, pp.1016-1033. Dellmuth, L.M., Stoffel, M.F. (2012), “Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: the local allocation of European Union structural funds”, European Union Politics, Vol. 13, No 3, pp.413-433. Esposti, R., Bussoletti, S. (2008), “Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A Panel-Data Approach”, Regional Studies, Vol. 42, No 2, pp.159-173. Faludi, A. (2006), “From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy”, Regional Studies, Vol. 40, No 6, pp.667-678. Golobic, M., Marat, N. (2011), “Territorial impact assessment: integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 34, No 3, pp.163-173. Hájek, O., Novosák, J., Zahradník, P. (2012), "Regionální disparity a financování regionální politiky - Některé poznatky z České Republiky", Politická ekonomie, Vol. 60, No 3, pp.330-349, [Regional disparities and financing of regional policy – some lessons from the Czech Republic, in Polish]. Hájek, O., Smékalová, L., Novosák, J., Zahradník, P. (2014), “Prostorová koherence národní a evropské regionální politiky: Poznatky z České republiky a Slovenska", Politická ekonomie, Vol. 62, No 5, pp.630-644, [Spatial coherence of national and European regional policy: lessons from the Czech Republic and Slovakia, in Polish]. Hudson, R. (2007), “Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice”, Regional Studies, Vol. 41, No 9, pp.1149-1160. Jaliu, D., Radulescu, C. (2013), “Six years in managing structural funds in Romania. Lessons learned”, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science, Vol. 9, No 38, pp.79-95. Kaufmann, A., Wagner, P. (2005), “EU regional policy and the stimulation of innovation: the role of the European Regional Development Fund in the Objective 1 region Burgenland”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 13, No 4, pp.581-599. Kemmerling, A., Bodenstein, T. (2006), “Partisan politics in regional redistribution. Do parties affect the distribution of EU structural funds across regions?”, European Union Politics, Vol. 7, No 3, pp.373-392. Lolos, S.E.G. (2009), “The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth, assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990-2005”, Economic Change Restructuring, Vol. 42, No 3, pp.211-228. Medeiros, E. (2012), Territorial Cohesion: a Conceptual Analysis, Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade. Medeiros, E. (2014), “Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy in Portugal (1990-2010) with Target TIA”, Impact Assessment and Project Management, Vol. 32, No 3, pp.198-212. Melecký, L., Nevima, J. (2011), “Application of econometric panel data model for regional competitiveness evaluation of selected EU 15 countries”, Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 3, No 4, pp.23-38. Milio, S. (2007), “Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy”, Regional Studies, Vol. 41, No 4, pp.429-442. Mirwaldt, K., McMaster, I., Bachtler, J. (2009), Reconsidering Cohesion Policy: the Contested Debate on Territorial Cohesion, Glasgow, University of Strathclyde. MRD CR (2014), Strategie regionálního rozvoje ČR na období 2014-2020, Prague, Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic, [Strategy of Regional Development of the Czech Republic for the Period 2014-2020, in Polish]. MoE CR (2010), Strategický rámec udržitelného rozvoje ČR, Prague: Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, [Strategic Framework of Sustainable Development of the Czech Republic, in Polish]. Nordregio (2005), Potentials for Polycentric Development in Europe, Luxembourg, ESPON Coordination Unit. Petrakos, G., Artelaris, P. (2009), “European regional convergence revisited: a weighted least squares approach”, Growth and Change, Vol. 40, No 2, pp.314-331. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (1998), “Social conditions and economic performance: the bond between social structure and regional growth in Western Europe”, Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 22, No 3, pp.443-459. Rodríguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R. (2008), “Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe”, Regional Studies, Vol. 42, No 1, pp.51-67. Schraff, D. (2014), “Buying turnout or rewarding loyalists? Electoral mobilization and EU structural funding in the German Länder”, European Union Politics, Vol. 15, No 2, pp.277-288. Skokan, K. (2010), "Inovační paradox a regionální inovační strategie", Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 2, No 2, pp.30-46, [Innovation paradox and regional innovation strategies, in Polish]. Tosun, J. (2014), “Absorption of regional funds: a comparative analysis”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, No 2, pp.371-387. Veneri, P., Burgalassi, D. (2012), “Questioning polycentric development and its effects. Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 regions”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 20, No 6, pp.1017-1037. Wokoun, R. (2007), “Regionální a strukturální politika (Politika soudržnosti) Evropské unie v programovém období 2007–2013”, Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, Vol. 10, No 1, pp.3-7, [Regional and structural policy (Cohesion policy) of the European Union in the programming period 2007-2013, in Polish]. Zaman, G., Georgescu, G. (2009), “Structural fund absorption: a new challenge for Romania?”, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 10, No 1, pp.136-154. Zonneveld, W., Waterhout, B. (2009), “EU territorial impact assessment: under what conditions?”, In 49th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Lodz, European Regional Science Association. Zumbusch, K., Scherer, R. (2013), “Mobilizing enterprises for regional innovation policies. How to assure an active involvement of located enterprises in regional development”, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 6, No 1, pp.13-27.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship	The authors are thankful to the Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF) and the national budget of the Czech Republic for grant No. CZ.1.07.2.3.00/20.0147 – “Human Resources Development in the Field of Measurement and Management of Companies, Clusters and Regions Performance” and for grant No. IGA/FaME/2014/003, which provided financial support for this research.